I Almost Wasted $15,000 on Drill Steel. Here's How I Learned to Buy Longhole Drills the Right Way.

-
If you're comparing quotes for Sandvik longhole drills and the cheapest option is from a new supplier, you're likely about to make a $5,000 mistake. I know because I almost did.
-
Why Your Longhole Drill Vendor Decision is a Minefield
- The Conventional Wisdom is Often Wrong: The TCO of a Sandvik Longhole Drill
-
How I Evaluate a Vendor Now (My 3-Step Process)
-
This System is Not Perfect (A Note on When to Ignore It)
If you're comparing quotes for Sandvik longhole drills and the cheapest option is from a new supplier, you're likely about to make a $5,000 mistake. I know because I almost did.
Back in Q2 2024, I was tasked with finding a new supplier for our Sandvik Coromant turning tools and longhole drill steel. Our annual spend was around $180,000, and I was looking to trim the fat. A new vendor—let's just say they were a smaller outfit, not one of the big names like Metso or Caterpillar—came in with a quote that was 22% lower on a basket of Sandvik longhole drills. I was ready to sign. My boss, a guy who loves a good deal, was all for it.
That's when I remembered a painful lesson from 2022. I'd done something similar with a batch of Chauvin hydraulic breakers. The price was incredible. The performance, however, was not. The steel chipped faster, the connections didn't hold up in our specific rock conditions, and the repair cycle was double the frequency. My quick "savings" evaporated as I spent more on replacements and downtime. I almost made the same mistake again.
Why Your Longhole Drill Vendor Decision is a Minefield
Most buyers, especially those new to the mining equipment procurement game, focus on the price of the steel or the turning tool insert. They look at the catalog for a Sandvik longhole drill—say, a model like the Peregrine or a Waldo—and get a quote from three vendors. Vendor A (maybe the OEM) quotes $100 per foot. Vendor B (a third-party) quotes $85. It looks like a no-brainer. But the real question is rarely asked: What is the total cost of ownership (TCO) for this specific tool in our specific application?
I've tracked over 200 purchase orders in our system over six years. The data is brutal. The so-called 'cheap' option—whether it's a Lewis vs. Waldo style comparison of lower-cost steel—results in 30-50% more unplanned maintenance on average. That's not a guess; it's a number from our cost tracking system. The question everyone asks is, 'What's your best price?' The question they should ask is, 'What's the cost of your steel failing two shifts before a planned blast?'
The Conventional Wisdom is Often Wrong: The TCO of a Sandvik Longhole Drill
Everything I'd read about longhole drilling said that the biggest cost is the steel. The conventional wisdom is that you should always get multiple quotes and that competition drives down prices. In practice, for our mine's particular geology—a mix of hard, fractured granite—I found the opposite. The Sandvik Coromant turning tools and the specific drill steel we use (the Peregrine series) aren't just a commodity. The metallurgy, the heat treatment, and the thread design are incredibly specific to the application. They're built to withstand the high-impact, high-wear environment for a set number of hours. A cheaper knock-off might look the same in the catalog, but it's a different beast underground.
The Moment Everything Changed
The vendor failure in March 2023 changed how I think about backup planning. A critical drilling pattern in a new stope was scheduled. We had a new batch of Chauvin-branded steel—chosen because of a slightly lower price—and it failed on the third hole. The shank snapped. We lost six hours of production, had to fly in a replacement (costing us $4,200 in emergency freight and travel for the service team), and we missed a cycle. Suddenly, the $500 I saved on the original order didn't seem like a saving at all. It was a $4,700 loss. I didn't fully understand the value of a known, traceable supply chain until that $3,000 order came back completely wrong—and by 'wrong,' I mean broken.
The 'cheap' option resulted in a $1,200 redo when quality failed.
How I Evaluate a Vendor Now (My 3-Step Process)
This isn't about saying you should never buy from a smaller vendor or that Sandvik is the only answer. That would be lazy. It's about being smart. Here's my system:
- Demand a Wear Life Test, Not a Price List: I now require vendors to provide a documented wear life guarantee per foot drilled. Not a generic 'up to X hours,' but a guarantee based on their steel in our rock type. I compare that number first. The cost per foot drilled is the only number that matters, not the cost per foot of steel.
- Check the Thread Geometry, Not Just the Brand: A Waldo vs. Lewis thread might look identical, but the thread profile, the hardness depth, and the surface finish are what determine durability. I ask for a case-hardening depth report. I've had vendors refuse—I cross them off the list.
- Look for the Hidden Costs in the 'Free' Stuff: One vendor offered 'free shipping.' I discovered it included a $150 'documentation fee' and a $200 'handling fee' that weren't on the initial quote. That 'free setup' offer actually cost us $450 more in hidden fees. Another vendor's 'low price' was only for orders placed 90 days in advance. Their 'rush' rate was 40% higher. I now ask for a total landed cost, including any 'expediting' or 'fuel surcharge,' before I compare anything.
This System is Not Perfect (A Note on When to Ignore It)
There are definitely situations where this approach backfires. If you have a highly experienced maintenance team that can re-tip and recondition steel on-site, or if you're using a standard, high-volume size like a common CNMG insert from the Sandvik Coromant turning tools catalog, the 'cheapest' option might be entirely fine. The tolerances are high, the supply chain is mature, and the failure mode is low-consequence. My system is for the expensive, mission-critical, application-specific stuff—the longhole drills that are the lifeblood of your production cycle. For the standard stuff, buy on price. For the special stuff, buy on data.
Note: Data points are from my internal procurement records for a mid-sized mining operation. Your experience may vary based on geology and maintenance practices. As of January 2025, our TCO model has saved us an estimated 17% on our annual budget of $180,000.
